-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WOW. this is actually a good move by the senate
-
You do not want to trust either
@SenatorBurr or@MarkWarner. Warner's the same Warner of this floater:#ReasonRoundup https://reason.com/blog/2018/07/31/democrats-tech-policy-plans-leaked …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do not ever leave that embassy without safe passage. Not safe outside it!
-
The two-party system still wants Wikileaks crucified.pic.twitter.com/bayj2iIheA
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The US doesn't have ethical standards. Wait, was that the joke?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Make yourself available for a closed interview".... Why not by remote live video? From a truly safe location - one not under power of USGov.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Julian Assange should thoroughly examine the immediate foreground before agreeing to testify before the US Senate Committee lest he steps into a trapdoor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can't stay in there forever. The people need you to set the record straight. My advice is make sure Trump is aware and NO CLOSED DOOR! Let the world hear your testimony!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right on time for their extradition plans. Julian should act like half the US politicians and ignore the DOJ. They’re not prosecuting anybody anyway.
-
But...if Julian Assange testifies in "closed doors," we won't know every word he says. Why can't a JUDGE ALLOW Julian Assange to testify "in public?" I think "very few" Republicans join Dems. That's what happens usually in the U.S. House of Representatives when it comes to vote.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.