don't implement features or fix bugs for Palantir. don't sell them paid support. don't let them pay for your conferences (hi @rustlang!). don't have their employees as team members (hi @rustlang again!)
so many things you could do without crippling your work with export control
-
-
-
lastly, if you think your code would be particularly harmful if Palantir used it, have you considered not writing or publicizing it at all? corporations violate licenses of open-source projects all the time, and it is a -really- hard and lengthy process to get them to stop
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
all the dependencies they list on their site are the most completely generic stuff, it's just utility libraries this is on a level with "if you sell groceries to Palantir employees, you're complicit!"
-
another way to think about this: /whatever/ capability you open-source, anyone can use it Palantir, the CCP, the Mafia, whoever but big and well-resourced entities like Palantir will obviously just commission in-house any capabilities they can't get open-source
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It's not even clear whether the "ethical source" licensing they're proposing is meant to assign the power to determine what uses are 'unethical' or not to individual contributors or a central committee. And I can't ask, because...pic.twitter.com/GXsCxSsT5p
-
The license itself is available and the authors are public. We figured the UN Declaration on Human Rights was a pretty good starting point. I mean it was ratified by the organization consisting of the governments representing basically all of humanity.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I like Coraline, but this approach is just...not working on so many levels :/ She's really quite adamant about following this wrong track, too
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I'm pretty sure any license that prevented Palantir from using your code is not Open Source and so your project will be removed from Debian. See Douglas Crockford's no-evil license, which was a joke, but almost got V8 removed from Debian.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
How would you even do it for already-released software?
-
I assume it's just "new versions get the new license", the same as how GPLv3 resulted in Apple not updating any of the GNU software in macOS anymore. (What that means for multi-author projects who don't have it together enough to agree to a license change I don't know)
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.