revolutionary idea number two: no one has a moral right (or an obligation) to prevent another human being from self-harm
if we look at the US (sigh), direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription drugs means that the general public has a perception of (say) ADs being a sort of psychiatric cure-all, which is justified if you have trust in medical institutions. another facet of the same issue...
-
-
Out of curiosity: this refers to some drugs more than to others, right? If so, have you got a clue why is them?
-
I don't understand this well enough, unfortunately.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.