"Windows 95 was 30 MB" is such an ignorant, obnoxious, trite take. a triple buffered framebuffer (which you want for smooth scrolling) for my 4K display is 70 MB in *pixels alone*. Obviously a complete webpage with precomposed textures would take more.https://twitter.com/julienPauli/status/1042113172143067138 …
-
-
I thought FeRAM doesn't have the necessary speed or density? However, I don't know if this is inherent or just the case with PZT-based FeRAM. I don't think anybody has commercialized a hafnium-based FeRAM yet though.
-
hence "indefinite gesture" :P
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or MRAM, which seems to have better density https://www.everspin.com
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I still don't get why nobody is working on good SRAM. Densities around 1/10 of DRAM should be possible at ridiculous speeds and essentially zero power consumption, and 1/10 is plenty.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.