I'm more interested in *your* definition. Does it include hyperbole; if something is temporarily removed by a learning-AI and brought back the same day does it still count as censorship?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
Disregarding the fact that you didn't respond to how the supposed censorship was accidental and hence returning, the obvious response you're looking for would be hyperbolic; something all-encompassing that can't be taken literally since unintentional removal is reversed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
Can you speak in more than one sentence? Or better yet, try and provide an answer to my question.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
No, the learning algorithm needs to learn. You as a dev should understand how learning algorithms operate. They cannot be perfect from the onset, and so mistakes are corrected. They aren't wringing their hands in delight when they have to fix the algorithm's slow learning curve.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NekoBlanchard @meedeeums and
What you're suggesting is akin to an electrical fire burning down a library, and in the interim before the building's books has been replaced people are shouting that their negligence at preventing the fire was blatant censorship despite their efforts correct and rebuild.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.