No, it's most likely the algorithm being dumb as hell in reacting to the content or a mass flagging that the algorithm reacted to.
-
-
Replying to @NekoBlanchard @jablesisaac and
Yes. That sounds very much like the YT of recent memory.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
-
Replying to @whatabadmeme69 @meedeeums and
That's not censorship, friend. It's a learning algorithm trying to learn. YouTube isn't going out of their way to stack up their bad PR on purpose. To quote YT's twitter: "
@theh3podcast Thanks for letting us know, we're looking into what happened and will keep you posted."1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
Considering YouTube had already apologized within minutes of it happening trying to figure out what caused it yes, it requires intent. The algorithm false-flags and its strikes are erased by YouTube all the time, just like they will be in this case. Relax.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
I'm more interested in *your* definition. Does it include hyperbole; if something is temporarily removed by a learning-AI and brought back the same day does it still count as censorship?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @AmazonFCBryan @meedeeums and
Disregarding the fact that you didn't respond to how the supposed censorship was accidental and hence returning, the obvious response you're looking for would be hyperbolic; something all-encompassing that can't be taken literally since unintentional removal is reversed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You still havent answered his question tho m8
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.