Harms of the XML spec: "EBCDIC", "32-Bit Encodings", "ByteOrder::Unusual2143". :-( https://github.com/wezm/xhtmlchardet/blob/master/src/lib.rs …
-
-
Replying to @hsivonen
@hsivonen@SimonSapin Care to elaborate on this? Not quite following this particular harm1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SimonSapin
@wezm@hsivonen Is there any evidence oft EBCDIC content you want to support? Has 2143/3412 byte order ever been anything but theoretical?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SimonSapin
@SimonSapin@hsivonen nup didn’t encounter any of them out in the wild. I mainly put them in for completeness :-/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wezm
@wezm@hsivonen I’m afraid completeness was the only reason someone included "unusual octet order" in 1997 http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-lang-970331#secE ….2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.