does anyone have strong opinions about panic behavior? disclaimer: I'm not advocating for changes to panic behavior in std or elsewhere, that said.. I am of the opinion that panics should bring down the process immediately, from any thread, panic=abort is the better default imo
-
Show this thread
-
I can't see a situation where I'd want the program to keep running if one of my panics get hit. I don't panic when the error can be handled or reasonably expected to occur. Once you're dealing with an error that should have been impossible limping along sounds dangerous
4 replies 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread
Replying to @yaahc_
I think something like a web application/server might be an example where if one thread panics that’s ok and the rest of the process can continue, perhaps replacing the dead thread in the pool?
7:57 PM - 26 May 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.