Conversation

Replying to and
What you posted is exactly what this ignorant post is in response to. The post remains bullshit. There is no genetic difference that accounts for this and no, not only white people can process lactose.
1
What are you talking about? It's not *only* white people. But he's not entirely wrong. It *is* mostly white people, but also Indians, but not southern French. It's not racist any more than pointing out the fact that white people are less UV-tolerant than darker-skinned people.
4
Did you read through the paper you linked thoroughly? They pointed out that epigenetics can be a contributing factor to phenotypes. Also just because certain genes can be associated with processing lactose, doesn't mean it is connected to race (which is unrelated to genetics).
2
2
Meh, who cares? There's also an ethnic association with alcohol dehydrogenase. The bad medical take was that "only" white people can process lactose. It's an oversimplification to say "only", but the association is strong.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @Boblet3001 @ChirpyT8 and @BadMedicalTakes
Not directly linked, but strongly associated. Lactase persistence is strongly associated with northwest Europe. In Britain and Ireland about 100% of the indigenous population have lactose persistence. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactase_p
1
Some people have lactase persistence. Some people don't. People who lived in Europe for millennia are likely to have less melanin and more lactase. It's not because they're white. But white people are also likely to have more lactase.
1
I don't see what's so controversial about this. White people are more likely to be ginger. Black people will often have afro-style hair. Dutch people are generally taller than Italians – nature v nurture? Who cares.