You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Spent ~8 hours with @DanielEllsberg & @avnercohen123 today. A question that arose: If Trump wanted to use force against DPRK, & the Pentagon had a study that outlined the risks & consequences (probably does), would someone with access be morally obligated to consider leaking it?
(You can probably guess Ellsberg's position. Note that question is whether they are morally obligated to CONSIDER leaking it, not whether they are obligated to actually leak it.)
Photo of Avner, Dan, and me, at Dan's house in California. And a photo of Dan while we were interviewing him.pic.twitter.com/MaDrB0h3oW
Honestly I can't imagine an answer other than yes. I'm someone who believes that the government has the right to keep secrets, and that leaks, even ones that are "good", corrode an institution's function in a way that is often ultimately not worth it...
BUT the human consequences of a new Korean war are so extreme and so dire and so global that worries about institutional integrity no longer matter at all. The sheer scale of the consequences of that war trump a lot of things that aren't normally trumped.
"This president" vs. "The President"?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
