And if you're the kind of person who would prefer a scanned PDF to a transcribed version, here ya go: http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/1945-05-12-Summary-of-Second-Target-Committee-Meeting.pdf …
-
-
Show this thread
-
And if you're interested in the first Target Committee meeting (which is also useful), here it is: http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/1945-05-02-Notes-on-the-Initial-Meeting-of-the-Target-Committee.pdf …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
interesting. as far as i can tell, there's no mention of civilians. weren't a million warning pamphlets airdropped over hiroshima? was that discussed at a later time?
-
There were no warning pamphlets dropped BEFORE the atomic bombs. The idea that there was is a strange and persistent myth, but easily debunked:http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2013/04/26/a-day-too-late/ …
-
The article you linked seems to contradict you - says leaflets came the month prior. But it also prompts a reevaluation of my notion that they wanted to avoid civilians to the extent possible while still forcing surrender. looks more like a CYA move. Thanks!
-
I know what the article does and does not say (I wrote it!) — no specific pamphlets warning about the atomic bomb were dropped until AFTER Nagasaki. There were generic "we are bombing Japan a lot" pamphlets dropped on many places — not the same thing as an actionable warning.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fascinating read. Amazing that Nagasaki was not even on the initial target list.
-
Nagasaki was only added when Kyoto was removed: https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/nagasaki-the-last-bomb …pic.twitter.com/IHwXMwHpxQ
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I had a question while reading this: when did "radio-active" become "radioactive"? Or was I fluid at the beginning?
-
"Radio-active" was used in the very very early days but rarely afterwards. If it is used in the 1940s it is probably a sign of unfamiliarity by the notetaker. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=radio-active%2Cradioactive&year_start=1900&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cradio%20-%20active%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cradioactive%3B%2Cc0 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please note "Dr. Dennison" is a central part of the discussion. The universe has the darkest sense of humor.
-
His full name is David Dennison. Which I guess now you know where Michael Cohen came up with that name.
-
I wonder if the reason he chose that name was the link to “Manhattan”. If so, that is uncharacteristically clever.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for this historical rabbit hole. After spending time on
@GeneDannen ‘s site, The Franck Report should also be required reading for us all.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok, I know what Imm reading after my nap.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Psychological factors in target selection"
-
The most important factor. The purpose was to achieve an unconditional Japanese surrender as quickly as possible. The Emperor and the regime needed to know that fighting on meant annihilation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Doing the decision to drop the bomb in my HS class tomorrow as it happens. I will use part of this. Thank you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I lived in Kokura, mentioned as a potential target, for a couple of years. Some of the older locals still called it "Lucky Kokura" because Nagasaki got hit instead...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.