Does anyone, on either side of the political aisle, actually think that the DPRK would give up its nuclear capability without receiving in exchange commitments that the US would not be willing to give? If the answer is "no" — what happens when this (inevitably) becomes clear?
-
-
Get things to the point where the US intelligence and military community can no longer whatsoever maintain the delusion that the US homeland wouldn't just get their hair mussed in some kind of "exchange."
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump will be desperate for some kind of deal to get out of the talks to tout as a "win". So NK might sell him some kind of temporary delaying deal even if it only lasts a year.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not to mention TELs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apply Occam's Razor. DPRK has probably tested everything functional they had (to spare?).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup. And meanwhile, get those sanctions lifted. A seemingly rational game and yet - especially given who's in the WH - a dangerous one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the recent tests the newest versions of the warheads (but not the ICBMs) were tested first as I remember?!?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.