1) That this is not talked about as THAT big a deal. Part of this is b/c Groves was overly confident that the spy effort was mostly unsuccessful (he only really knew about their efforts at Berkeley). But the framing was in general very different than Cold War.
-
-
Show this thread
-
2) That their discussion of this was mostly as a question of how transactional they can be with regards to the Soviets and "the secret." It's about the quid pro quo aspect to trading the secret for something. Again, a very different approach from later Cold War.
Show this thread -
3) And, of course, Groves expressing to Roosevelt that he had no confidence of keeping such secrets "permanently." Just another example from the time that even high officials thought that long-term secrecy was probably impossible, and just a temporary wartime measure.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.