The silliest thing about the "children are natural scientists" line (which is common amongst scientists for whatever reason) is it actually underemphasizes how hard it is to be a scientist, and how many millennia it took before we really had "science" in the modern sense.
-
Then can't you define it?
Define what? It's not specific knowledge. The cluster of practices, etc., vary by field. It's what it means to get a PhD.
-
-
You're a historian, so I point out (a) your answer has the same quality as religious knowledge (look), and (b) I inquired about science itself, not a practice which has lost itself. People should admit their science is only able to be as true as their self-knowledge.
-
You're not making any sense, sorry.
-
Not to you, maybe :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.