4. Some very famous and supposedly very smart people were on Theranos's board. Henry Kissinger Bill Perry George Shultz Sam Nunn Bill Frist Gary Roughead James Mattis Dick Kovacevich Riley Bechtel William Foegehttp://fortune.com/2015/10/15/theranos-board-leadership/ …
-
Show this thread
-
5. Most resigned as Theranos's problems emerged. But why didn't they do minimal due diligence before they joined the board? Or ask hard questions?
6 replies 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
6. Why did Holmes draw on so many national security people for a health corporation?
3 replies 8 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
7. Why were those people so willing to accept?
5 replies 3 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @CherylRofer
My suspicion, in a word: networking. Without wanting to be overly cynical about it: when you're building support for ANYTHING unconventional, you need to show you have buy-in from respected people. You use your existing connections to get others, and then leverage reputations.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @CherylRofer
This is LARGELY the most useful thing I learned how to do at Harvard as an aside. It is frankly what Harvard as an institution excels at. The names on that list are Stanford-centric, so I assume the same dynamic is as work.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @CherylRofer
And I would again emphasize that not-just-bad-guys do this. I don't know any other way to launch big things if you don't have the reputation yourself. But if the core turns out to be rotten, it looks shady.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein
I think this is all plausible. But golly gee, I would have checked out something like this a little more carefully than they did, networking or not. Or maybe networking requires that suspension of critical thought. I went to a different kind of college.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CherylRofer
Silicon Valley does encourage a wishful thinking that is frequently *deliberately* uncritical, to avoid strangling ideas before they are fully born. You can see the argument for it, I guess. But yeah. Looks quite bad here!
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
I had a boss like that once. You get a lot more garbage than good ideas that way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm a fan of Linus Pauling's "If you want to have good ideas you must have many ideas" notion — but Pauling also acknowledged you had to ruthlessly weed out the bad ones, in search for the few good ones that lay within them.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein
Yep. And not inflict the whole mess on your colleagues.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.