That' s awesome :) But which is more expensive to make: Uraniun or Plutonium? Plutoniun is get by irradiating Uranium in Fast reactor, by means of decay and chemical purity. In other words HEU requires more aparatus to bring it bot U233 and 235, both fissile.
-
-
Replying to @emersoncapuano @SpaceCat4NonPro and
Plutonium is more expensive. The Uranium enrichment process is simpler and easier than reactors plus isotope separation of Pu.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeorgeWHerbert @emersoncapuano and
also just worth noting that if you have BOTH you can set up very efficient warheads — there can be a very economical "mix"
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @GeorgeWHerbert and
Composite cores ftw! Historical example would suggest DPRK prob doing them too?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @NuclearAnthro @wellerstein and
Could a little amount of HEU ( about 1inch or less), in a boosted configuration be capable to produce fast neutrons making U238 undergoing fission? Is U238 explosion higher than U235, even Pu?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emersoncapuano @NuclearAnthro and
A sphere of HEU with a 1 inch diameter is only 0.16 kg... that feels like a strong "no" to me (a couple orders of magnitude smaller than smallest U235 cores I have heard of). U238 fissioning releases approx. same energy per gram of fissioning as U235 and Pu (~18 kt/kg).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @emersoncapuano and
If you're asking about 1 inch around a Pu core, I don't know how much that would help. It wouldn't be a good approach to a composite weapon (which usually use a little bit of Pu and a lot of HEU).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @NuclearAnthro and
In terms of less active material than usual, i think only 1 inch of uranium could release less than 1kt but even 1kt means a huge damage if it was exploded by airdrop ( that would maximize damage around its target) Is that right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emersoncapuano @NuclearAnthro and
I am not sure I understand what you're asking (or why). Again, 1 inch diameter sphere of HEU is only 0.16 kg. Getting a supercritical assembly out of that is not going to be easy. Even if it fissioned 100% (unlikely) would only release <10 tons (not kt) of energy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @NuclearAnthro and
Sorry about my comments. I understood You wrote. I was trying to tell that if NK has not enough active material, weapons' engineers easily could build a nuclear weapon with low yield, but with best results.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It is possible to make very low yield weapons with a kilogram or perhaps less of material, but it is not easy and the results are not great. I don't think that's what DPRK would be doing.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @emersoncapuano and
Yeah. You can make a neutron/gamma grenade moderated criticality device more easily but useful explosives yield doesn't scale down well.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.