As if historians of technology have written nothing about this... https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/making-silicon-valley … https://twitter.com/IEEEInstitute/status/969798777472278528 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LeapingRobot
Serious question -- ideas on how to advocate productively to get people writing essays of this sort to find and read and mention some of the scholarship?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ehepler
I wish I had an answer to this.
@ColdWarScience hits on a painful point though. One answer - p'raps@wellerstein has thoughts - is to cultivate productive relationships with editors of journals (cf.@PhysicsToday). But that's not a cure-all.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @LeapingRobot @ehepler and
I don't think we can expert non-scholars to take a whole lot of their time to trawl through our scholarly outputs. Esp. if we don't make it easy to do. Let's face it — even we have hard times keeping up with the literature, knowing where to start on a new topic, etc.
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @LeapingRobot and
The reason my stuff is (vastly) overrepresented in any journalism related to nuclear history is because my blog and popular writings makes it accessible and makes me findable. Not saying every scholar should or can do that. But that's the way journalism works in the aggregate.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
(BTW, this is what I mean by my own work being vastly overrepresented. I mean, I think I do pretty good work, but I can admit I'm not *this* good, above everyone else in this list. I get these results with Incognito Mode on FWIW.)pic.twitter.com/9r0iqLgkdR
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.