Do you happen to have that in pdf? Maybe on your site?
Livermore report from 1963 on the feasibility of excavating of a canal through Israel's with 2 Mt nuclear devices, spaced at 4 per mile for 130 miles = 520 nukes = 1.04 Gt of explosives! "Another problem which has not been considered is that of political feasibility..." 
pic.twitter.com/QECj5JCrEu
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Unbelievable. What was the plan for the radioactivity?
-
"Don't bother taking it into consideration," apparently... I mean, I presume they would be trying to use very "clean" (mostly fusion) bombs. But even with, say, 1% fission, from that many bombs you'd still get a nasty amount of fission products (10 Mt or so).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My dad worked for a company in the Bay Area in the 60s on calculations that ended up being for some Plowshare Project related thing using nuclear bombs to dig a canal across North America. He had to get Q clearance to learn what the calculations he had been doing were for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One would have thought that fracking natural gas formations with nuclear weapons would only produce radioactive gas...And yet Rio Blanco (three 33kT simultaneous) & Mandrel/Rulison (40kT) were detonated in Colorado. The gas was too radioactive to produce! Who knew?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so, instead they left them in the ground and call it the "samson option"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
$500k for a 2MT underground detonation?? What a steal!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Frederick Reines 1950 "The biggest obstacle to more widespread use of atomic bombs in geoengineering: “Large quantities of radiation limit the possible uses of atomic explosives as a blasting agent. ... of course, if the radioactivity is overlooked, more things become possible.”
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I like how when they bring up political feasibility they only mention that Arab states might not like the canal... it never asks whether Israel would be ok with nuking itself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Through the Negev
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
cost effective
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And how much would be the cost using only C-4?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't tell Trump.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really makes me wonder about why no one realized that the earth would be radioactive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dr. Strangelove was a real person!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.