very nice
NASA tool allows estimation of population size
#visualization http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v4/population-estimation-service …pic.twitter.com/YY4IUlKunf
-
GPW is where people *live*, LandScan is where they are likely to be in *any given 24 hour period*. So slightly different results for your nuke usage.
Recently someone suggested I add a feature where it would find the point of maximum fatalities for any given local detonation. I decided after thinking about it that that was not a feature I needed to add to it, at least not a public version...
-
-
Do you have topography?
-
No. My model doesn't take it into account so I just ignore it. In theory it shouldn't be too hard to generate a grid cell topographic map from open source data though? I've never tried.
-
For a still-in-progress project related to nuclear burning, I have a lot of datasets relating to land cover and urban build-up. Someday hope to integrate those into things (have a student working on it)...
-
“nuclear burning” is a fun phrase.
-
It's fun to be able to say, "ah, yeah, that comes out of the nuclear burning account."
-
Can someone define "nuclear burning"? Does this refer to things igniting?
-
Right. I'm interested in coming up with rough, on-the-fly numbers for how much smoke would be created from any given nuke going off, based on terrain parameters (e.g. grassland vs. desert), density and flammability of buildings, etc.
-
If I could get reasonable back of the envelope numbers on the fly (e.g., less than a second of calculation per detonation, like the casualty numbers NUKEMAP can already generate very quickly), I could do interesting things with that.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.