At the risk of being blocked, I'd like to suggest the @nybooks find another nuclear history reviewer besides Thomas Powers...@GordinMichael or @wellerstein for example would bring a fresher and more informed perspective
-
-
Replying to @LeapingRobot @nybooks and
@nybooks needs a whole new and much younger stable of authors. I've been a faithful reader and subscriber sonce the '70s, but in the last 10-15 years,@nybooks has gone downhill. I just threw a whole year away, and had hardly read anything in it. Time to pull the plug.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @KathrynOlesko @LeapingRobot and
I let my subscription lapse because I found I wasn't reading it. The science coverage was a part of that.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GordinMichael @wellerstein
The review has Ellsberg talking about LeMay's wish for "one bomb, for all of Russia" but says SAC never pursued this. True?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LeapingRobot @GordinMichael
He says that Sam Cohen (problematic neutron-bomb inventor guy) told him that he was at a meeting where LeMay said that. It sounds like a bad joke by LeMay, not a serious "ask."
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
FWIW, you can't do one bomb for all of Russia — at least not selectively. You could make a bomb that made the entire northern hemisphere deadly. But not *just* Russia.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
If you have a weapon that can take out all of Russia in one boom it is also going to contaminate Europe and North America, too, is what I mean. True Doomsday Bomb. SAC not interested in overt suicide bomb — they believed nuclear war could be fought and won.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.