I really want to see who I can get to publish an article about how blockchain solves Ballistic Missile Defense.
I bet MDAA would run with it. 
#PhDLifepic.twitter.com/fZe3vnV9sz
-
I saw someone do something similar at the 5 Eyes Analytic Workshops conference I went to. The math got blackboxed.pic.twitter.com/f50Mc25Kzl
The math bothers me less than the code — which is often a weak point in systems that seem secure on paper — and the fact that I've never seen a really convincing explanation of how blockchain can be used to securely account for real-world objects (as opposed to virtual).
-
-
I totally buy that blockchain would create a reliable accounting of a virtual asset (like Bitcoin). But making the jump to real-world assets (esp. ones you care about, like warheads) seems like it involves a lot of things that coders don't think about.
-
At least, I haven't seen it explained to a degree that I would have any confidence in it. And, again, the ratio of "revolutionary" talk to actual explanations has been in my experience suspiciously lop-sided.
-
I think this was the moment I kind of checked out on it to be honest:https://twitter.com/techreview/status/933670922720108544 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.