Agree 100%. Need to know what we really know, where areas of legitimate uncertainty are, etc.
-
-
So, you are an academic. Find some funding and set it up. I'll happily moderate panels...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Working on it, in fact... :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Just saw this is happening (not the same thing as we were discussing, but related): https://artsandhumanities.fas.harvard.edu/event/presidential-first-use-nuclear-weapons-it-legal-it-constitutional-it-just …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Looks like a really good program.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Woolaf @AtomicAnalyst and
Although, I'd guess the conclusions are kind of baked into the panel, and the way the question is asked
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Please join us for a panel discussion entitled, "OH MY GOD WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE? DON'T YOU AGREE?"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Or "OMG We're even worse than the bad guys, don't you agree." (Don't get me wrong its a wonderful group of people, just pre-baked.)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I think they are — unfortunately — asking the wrong question. Whether it is legal/constitutional/just is really not pressing question.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
"How the hell do we change this ASAP" is the better question, IMO.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @Woolaf and
"And what should we change it do, if we can?" is the follow-up discussion.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.