Some translation from the "truth of nature" into a language of humans (of which mathematics is one). That's not avoidable.
-
Which is ironically not very scientific! /thread
One last little thing: here's another way to think about it. Are nuclear weapons themselves social constructs?
-
-
In the sense meant by social construction, yes. They are created by society, by social practices. They certainly don't just grow on trees.
-
They are made to satisfy certain social goals, of certain societies. Over time, those goals have shifted a bit—hence the weapons have, too.
-
Their creation, deployment, and use are all dictated by social practices. And indeed, the weapons themselves may dictate some practices—
-
for example, they tend to require secrecy in the organizations that create them.
-
Does that make the weapons not real? Of course not. They're real. Society making something doesn't make it non-real.
-
Money is a social construct — but you still have to pay the bills.
-
Race is a social construct — a fact that won't help you if you're an African-American in a dodgy traffic stop.
-
Just because things are social constructs doesn't mean they can't have power or be real in the world. Social construction ≠ solipsism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.