And implicit assumption that even if NK could, it will only (!) be the 10kt variety and not thermonuclear, in the near future at least 3/
-
Show this thread
-
Many NK missile experts say yes, warhead capability likely eg
@ArmsControlWonk ,@CherylRofer ,@nktpnd ,@NarangVipin@Joshua_Pollack 4/1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Likewise, press reports say intel community assessment is even if not certain today, capability plausible, and likely certain soon 5/
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
And those outside experts have made a reasonable case that deliverable h-bomb (100kt +) is quite acheivable, now to fairly soon 6/
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
A 100kt changes the effects radii, of course. (from
@wellerstein NUKEMAP) 7/pic.twitter.com/qI3bYyeJiB
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Of note: the bigger the bomb, the more the relative importance of thermal (heat) effects vs blast. 8/
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
The orange circle is severe 3rd degree burns / fires started; blue is heavy structural damage. 9/
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
For the largest bomb tested (50MT 'tsar bomb'), the critical burn injury / fires zone extends to Baltimore... 10/pic.twitter.com/7y0zssgCvC
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
Do we know if the Soviets ever attached anything close to Tsar Bomba to an ICBM?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Never. Too big.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
The CIA worried in 1960s that Soviets would deploy 50-100 Mt ICBMs. They did deploy 25 Mt (SS-9 Mod 2). But not 50-100 Mt.pic.twitter.com/CXsUpH9Rr8
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @RadioFreeTom and
This issue is not its technical impossibility — but expense/difficulty per missile/warhead would be very very high.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @RadioFreeTom and
Tsar Bomba was an inelegant "hack." US scientists thought with some effort, one could reduce weight. Still would be heavy, though.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.