The answers varied. Some liked the status quo — a few thousand. Some thought you could go down to a few hundred, per UK/France/China.
Show this thread
-
For what it is worth, I do not think it is worth even analyzing this as any kind of realistic policy proposal. It is impossible.
Show this thread
It is just a sign of his lack of understanding of the issues, and perhaps a window into his own insecurities.
-
-
To illustrate the issue, to produce ~1,000 warheads/year, you need the nuclear complex that Eisenhower had. That took a decade to build.
Show this thread -
That is just the warheads. You would need much more to produce the missiles, subs, bombers, that might carry them. It's not happening.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.