A year or so ago, I gave my undergrad engineers a homework prompt: How many nuclear weapons does the US need to feel secure?
-
-
He doesn't realize that you can't just conjure nukes out of thin air, that they can't just be manufactured at will, on the spot anymore.
Show this thread -
But it confirms again this obvious truth: he is manifestly unfit to be dealing with nuclear weapons. And yet...https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/01/no-one-can-stop-president-trump-from-using-nuclear-weapons-thats-by-design/?utm_term=.f299c4136e5d …
Show this thread -
For what it is worth, I do not think it is worth even analyzing this as any kind of realistic policy proposal. It is impossible.
Show this thread -
It is just a sign of his lack of understanding of the issues, and perhaps a window into his own insecurities.
Show this thread -
To illustrate the issue, to produce ~1,000 warheads/year, you need the nuclear complex that Eisenhower had. That took a decade to build.
Show this thread -
That is just the warheads. You would need much more to produce the missiles, subs, bombers, that might carry them. It's not happening.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually your desperate need to push your agenda via derogatory comments speaks more of you than the president. You people are ill equipped to handle someone like Trump he's mastered the game. You've lost but don't perceive it. Ha!
-
What are you on abt? Comprehend point being made, then offer a logical rebuttal if you don’t agree. Not whatever ad hominem nonsense this is
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’d say just print a new graph showing the curve going back up to make him happy, but he’d immediately start talking publicly about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.