route that it did with the Fermi/Amaldi slow neutrons patent: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/501097 …
-
Yes, up to a certain point. Not the bomb itself. That's senseless.
It's not senseless. Again, it's about consolidating control. If you want to say something is senseless, blame IP law! OSRD took it seriously
-
-
To say that the bomb doesn't need to be cared for by IP procedures means saying it is going to be considered different every other tech;
-
...which *Congress* was able and willing to do! But federal government can't do that on its own, during a secret project.
-
Atomic Energy Act of 1946 bans patenting of nuclear weapons in US — it is the *only* category of working tech treated that way!
-
Which shows the lengths you have to go if you want to make the bomb fall "outside the law" (i.e., you have to change the law).
-
Seriously, Alex, if Szilard or anyone had sued for rights to the bomb? Zilch.
-
Only because they changed the laws! People in charge of this took a cavalier attitude towards patent law in WWI, and paid for it.
-
Read the article I wrote! Or just presume to know, your choice...
-
Alex, your article was published in 2008 and I'm quite familiar with it.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.