10/8/1935: British War Office rejects Leo Szilard's offer to turn over nuclear patents. http://ow.ly/SgvD30fGRNS @wellerstein @PhysicsToday
-
-
If the War Office had taken Szilard's advice, Britain might have become the first nuclear power.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @GeneDannen @AtomicHeritage and
Interesting conjecture. Not sure if they had near resources to pull it off. Wonder if they patented it would USA had to license to use tech?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Casillic @GeneDannen and
If filed in USA, US either would have decided it was not reduced to practice at time (which wd have been correct), or it would have gone 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @Casillic and
route that it did with the Fermi/Amaldi slow neutrons patent: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/501097 …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @Casillic and
Which is to say: the US would not have let it get in their way at all. They had various means of doing that: http://alexwellerstein.com/publications/wellerstein_patentingthebomb(isis).pdf …
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @GeneDannen and
interesting point companies need to have person as inventor on patents, it can't be just company. Wonder if same applies countries / Nat lab
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
In US patent law, there needs to be a human "inventor" (or multiple). Doesn't matter context. Work by gov't/labs same thing.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @GeneDannen and
Makes sense. The US patent application process is crazy. Enjoying your article! Guess they could be “lone inventors” too. Thanks!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.