In response to inquiries: Rough simulation (Sept15-29) of #radio-isotope cloud from hypothetical atmospheric burst over Pacific: #CTBT #IMSpic.twitter.com/361ZBkoUy7
-
-
Replying to @SinaZerbo
Without information about what the scale means (much less assumptions), this is not just useless, it is dangerous.
4 replies 5 retweets 45 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @SinaZerbo
People are going to confuse what look like very low rad levels characteristic of "global fallout" with "local fallout" intensities.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @SinaZerbo
To contrast the difference: on the left is the local fallout estimates of one shot (Bravo, 15Mt, surface/atoll), on the right, the global.pic.twitter.com/1u9tln8bXD
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @dmatthewstewart @SinaZerbo
15 Mt was the yield of the specific shot I was using as an example (Castle Bravo) — that is a BIG bomb (biggest the US ever set off).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It just happens to be a shot for which we have a lot of ready-made fallout data (local & global), which is why I used it for illustration.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
By contrast, that is about 100 times more powerful (and more radioactive) than whatever bomb the DPRK set off (15,000 kt vs. 150 kt).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.