Map of doom-- they have also hinted at NYC and SF in various videos:https://twitter.com/narangvipin/status/911075996169732096 …
I mean the reverse — targets US would strike over "there", not over "here."
-
-
Targets that the US would specifically use nukes on?
-
Targets the US might be *tempted* to use nukes on. E.g., things "hard enough" & "important enough" that conventional "might not do it."
-
Yeah, I think a lot of tunnels and caves would be hit, but there are enough road mobile missiles we wouldn't get them all.
-
Wouldn't need to use nukes on all (any?) targets, but also need to hit airstrips, pads, highways that are known launch sites.
-
Also hit their radar sites and wmd facilities (again, not necessarily with nukes).
-
Check Lieber/Press for their exchange analysis too, but I agree with Melissa as always
-
Yeah, they had something out a few months ago that I strongly disagreed with, but it has a map.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Oh! Sorry, misunderstood. Everything north of the 38th parallel....
-
That wasn't flippant, if we truly have a nuclear counterforce strategy it may have to be...
-
Yeah, they move things around quite a bit on road mobile trucks in and out of tunnels and caves.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.