@wellerstein, what do you think about patents on non-nuclear weapons, for example US patent 5,698,812 ?https://www.ideenschmied.eu/us-patent-5698812-thermite-destructive-device/ …
-
-
Replying to @ideenschmied_eu
If the question is, "do they release info which should not be released?" that is a broad question re: value of secrecy vs. disclosure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @ideenschmied_eu
If question is (as w/ your post), would someone be infringing if they used it — b/c it is assigned to US government, can be used freely.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @ideenschmied_eu
The reason a patent is assigned to the US government is, in effect, to make it "free for all." For better or worse!!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @ideenschmied_eu
US gov owns patents assigned to it. US gov can enforce its patents just like any private corp: restrict use or license or dedicate to public
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patonwith1t @ideenschmied_eu
Sorry, I should clarify — pre-Bayh-Dole (1980), a government assignment is essentially dedicated to public. Post-Bayh-Dole, more complex.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Or such is my understanding of it. (I Am Not a Patent Lawyer, just a historian who has written on government-assigned patents in 1940s.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.