4b. Ballistic missile defense attempts to shoot it down, but fails to hit it. Good for DPRK, bad for BMD (e.g. US).
Show this thread
-
And I think one should not be too confident in actually getting everything in a preemptive strike. So you're risking a city in the process.
I don't think that level of risk is worth the possible reward. Hope our generals/leaders feel the same way. Better to just contain/deter.
-
-
Mate, I'm all for peace & diplomacy, yet it's not going that way with two nutters in charge!! Could SK rescue NK after poss regime change?
-
What does "rescue" mean here? "Regime change" means a big war. Don't underestimate its ease.
-
When the Germanies reunited, it was a huge economic drain/difficulty. And East Germany hadn't been ravaged by a recent war.
-
Of course, yet it also shows that it can work, given the right framework & intention. Germany is now Germany, NK & SK could become Korea...
-
Except China is adamantly opposed to the South taking over Korea
-
If it's to benefit of a New Korea & global safety, then I couldn't give two plops what China wants..if anything, they're exacerbating situ!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How do you feel about a crash NK specific boost phase missile defense program?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.