Testing a live nuclear warhead on an actual ballistic missile is risky from many perspectives, which is why US only did it once in Cold War.
-
-
Hi Alex, what's estimate for how many NK nukes..10..20?? Could pre-emptive strike on sites, eliminate threat & minimise casaulties?
-
We don't really know, and I think one can assume that a preemptive strike would not end threat without full on war.
-
And I think one should not be too confident in actually getting everything in a preemptive strike. So you're risking a city in the process.
-
I don't think that level of risk is worth the possible reward. Hope our generals/leaders feel the same way. Better to just contain/deter.
-
Mate, I'm all for peace & diplomacy, yet it's not going that way with two nutters in charge!! Could SK rescue NK after poss regime change?
-
What does "rescue" mean here? "Regime change" means a big war. Don't underestimate its ease.
-
When the Germanies reunited, it was a huge economic drain/difficulty. And East Germany hadn't been ravaged by a recent war.
-
Of course, yet it also shows that it can work, given the right framework & intention. Germany is now Germany, NK & SK could become Korea...

- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
genuine question - are tsunamis a possibility if the explosion takes place near the surface of the ocean ??
-
No. Deep *under*-water detonations can cause big waves nearby, but not long-range. And US tested MUCH bigger bombs than DPRK likely has.
-
Ok. Thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I was thinking test would involve blast in mid-pacific using an old freighter or fishing boat as platform. Harder to track.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow.. Great analysis!! Respect!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.