Testing a live nuclear warhead on an actual ballistic missile is risky from many perspectives, which is why US only did it once in Cold War.
-
-
But ultimately, it's up to them—so who knows? Nations have been known to take bad risks in the past. Including "sane" nations like USA.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but based on the FM's statement, should US and her allies assume that any future ICBM/IRBM launched towards the Pacific may be "live"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They could also lose the warhead in an area rich in manganese nodules.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They will attempt the test if not persuaded otherwise. Expect will have a lot to say about this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.