Testing a live nuclear warhead on an actual ballistic missile is risky from many perspectives, which is why US only did it once in Cold War.
Show this thread
-
These accumulated risks are enough that I would think that DPRK would *not* choose to try this.
Show this thread
There are only a few "good" outcomes here for DPRK, and they'd be hard to judge the probability of occurring versus the others.
-
-
Presumably their military and scientific people are aware of this. If DPRK wants to rattle US, or demonstrate capability, many other ways.
Show this thread -
But ultimately, it's up to them—so who knows? Nations have been known to take bad risks in the past. Including "sane" nations like USA.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Response by outraged nations to even one of these events. Doublebad for everyone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes but imagine the rewards, especially in these times where social media and nuke deniers coexist.
-
And it would be the most devastatingly satisfying way imaginable of shutting up the Cheeto-in-Chief. For good.
-
Be like if you could personally torture Eric Cartman to death. I mean who would pass up such an opportunity?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.