And if that's the case, then the practical effect is same. I worry that doubt is used by people (not you) who want to avoid accepting this.
-
-
Cheryl Rofer Retweeted Cheryl Rofer
See my thread. Possible they don't have a compact warhead but a larger boosted/TN device.https://twitter.com/CherylRofer/status/905060149395521536 …
Cheryl Rofer added,
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
It's possible, but the simpler explanation is that the have a H-bomb. New graph from
@ctbto_alerts shows range up to 1MTpic.twitter.com/740PDHsc4X
1 reply 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @Cirincione @wellerstein and
What I'm saying is that what they tested may not fit in the case they showed.
4 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @CherylRofer @Cirincione and
Omg none of you disagree. As a matter of policy, we have to assume it's thermonuclear. As a matter of analysis, we look for evidence.
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
-
Replying to @CherylRofer @ajmount and
Unless we get a sniff it could be either. Yield is inconclusive alone. Remember Ivy King? 500kT of pure unadulterated fission.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
-
Replying to @CherylRofer @NarangVipin and
I simply don't understand on the insistence for extraordinary evidence to prove an ordinary claim.
2 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @ArmsControlWonk @CherylRofer and
The advanced features shown are not ordinary this early in a program. That said, nobody has calibrated recent development programs to know
5 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
Which is only to say: I am not sure the models we have for prog. development (most of which are for powers in the '40s-60s) are good guides.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @GeorgeWHerbert and
Every nuclear weapons program has been sui generis.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.