Ah, nuclear truthers. In the wild. Amazing how quickly we go from "nukes don't exist" to "THE JEWS DID IT!" http://www.big-lies.org/nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/mobile-nuke.html …pic.twitter.com/FNEEUgWj0P
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The ones that aren't just purely silly are a strange result of people talking about nukes and firebombs as equivalent, which is curious.
that's a tough one. If I personally had to chose, I'd take going out in a nuke strike over a firebomb
I've written on this question, for what it is worth — your chance of survival dramatically higher with firebombs:http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/09/22/tokyo-hiroshima/ …
I'm pretty sure I don't want to survive a nuclear war. My assumption is being in the kill zone.
in either case, they are both pretty horrific.
No doubt! Choose neither, if that's an option!
If there is a hell, these people will be condemned to debate the EMP folks for eternity, and vice versa.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.