I dunno. I feel like the backlash against TW was larger than the push for them. I know no academics who think they should be mandatory....
-
So if I've understood this convo, you do in fact give TWs and you just don't call them that as a way of avoiding pathologization?
To put it another way: we should always be helping our students frame the readings, but not b/c we are afraid of offending/disturbing them.
-
-
I'm honestly on the same page as the earlier questioner. I think you do what most of us who use TW do. We're quibbling about words.
-
What you're objecting to isn't what 95% of us think of as what TW are about.
-
TW is pretty basic and basically decent. Like being PC. I tend to be confused by people who object to either. And both were weaponized by RW
-
The difference that I see: I *do* see people on the left calling for TW. I *do* see unis demanding them. That's not coming from the right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.