1) I don't want to diminish the horror of the atomic attacks on Hiroshima & Nagasaki, but I do feel we need to clear up a misconception.
-
-
Replying to @AndrewPaulWood
2) Labelling them civilian targets isn't quite accurate. Hiroshima was base for the Chugoku Regional Army, Army Marine HQ & heavy industry
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewPaulWood
90% of casualties at Hiroshima were civilian. You can say it was a city with a military base in it, but the city itself was a city.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
I can say it was the main supply port for the Japanese Navy. I can also say I deplore the indiscriminate targeting of civilians.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewPaulWood
And with Nagasaki in particular: the USAAF *truly* did not think it was a very important target in 1945.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
The USAAF bombed Nagasaki five times in the year leading up to, but yes it was mostly down to weather conditions.
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
1) Yes, it bombed *the docks* (not the city itself) several times (legitimate proportionality!), 2) this is again further indication of its
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.