Are you confusing circular error probable with single shot probability of kill?...https://twitter.com/wellerstein/status/890999430366756864 …
-
Firstly, I did point it out, and even sent you a paper to show why you're wrong. Secondly, I'm a Cambridge educated scientist
you're acting like a troll. So I'm gonna mute you. Take care!
-
-
No, I'm simply pointing out you're incorrect and you can't handle that. Some academic you are
-
Summary: someone asked for missile CEP. You said it depended on target hardness (it doesn't).I corrected you. You threw tantrum
-
CEP is the radius within which a missile has 50% likelihood of LANDING. Nothing to do with what it does once landed!
-
Whether or not it takes out a target is about its probability of kill, a totally different metric.
-
What you fail to realise is that anyone worth their salt knows this, from missile experts to gun experts and many others.
-
Misrepresenting the original question, as you did to avoid admitting your obvious error, is both dishonest and pathetic.
-
I notice you are an historian. You claimed I was confused and didn't understand. So I pointed out why I do understand - so you threw insults
-
If you cannot even accept with good grace when you have made an error, then you have a LOT to learn about science. End of discussion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.