Are you confusing circular error probable with single shot probability of kill?...https://twitter.com/wellerstein/status/890999430366756864 …
-
CEP is, essentially, a measure of a missile's precision - not of its efficacy against target once hit.
The question was, with, say, 5km CEP, could a 30kt warhead be a credible deterrent? Answer clearly "yes" against large urban targets.
-
-
-
I think you only saw part of the thread. Relevance for knowing CEP is its relationship with other variables, of course. I know what CEP is!
-
Clearly you don't, since you're trying to argue something scientifically inaccurate
-
OK, LOL. If you see anything actually inaccurate, feel free to point it out. Right now it looks like you are just confused.
-
Firstly, I did point it out, and even sent you a paper to show why you're wrong. Secondly, I'm a Cambridge educated scientist
-
you're acting like a troll. So I'm gonna mute you. Take care!
-
No, I'm simply pointing out you're incorrect and you can't handle that. Some academic you are
-
Summary: someone asked for missile CEP. You said it depended on target hardness (it doesn't).I corrected you. You threw tantrum
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.