Later records confirm Julius was a spy for USSR during WWII. Ethel, not so clear. Question of proportionality of sentence a separate issue.
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I find Julius simultaneously enigmatic and repellent — the horror of orphaning children in the defense of Stalin.http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/10/17/riddle-julius-rosenberg/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PS, I block obvious antisemites without agonizing over it — I'm too busy argue with idiots who wear their idiocy on their sleeve.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In 1945, the Franck Report predicted USSR could have the bomb in 'a few years.' http://www.dannen.com/decision/franck.html …pic.twitter.com/4i97ILyZWE
-
Right. Standard line amongst scientists in 1945 was "about 5 years." Even that mostly just a guess.
-
Did Groves *actually* believe that it would take twenty years for the Soviets to get the bomb?
-
Yes. For a variety of reasons: thought he had a monopoly on uranium, thought Russian engineering not precise enough for tolerances required,
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How essential were they to the Soviet atomic project compared to, say, Klaus Fuchs.
-
Not very essential, in terms of any concrete details, etc. Their info mostly confirmed that Fuchs info was not just made up.
-
Yet still just as much as hostile and guilty as Fuchs. Fuchs proved a bit nutty in his arrogance of seeing his fame as untouchable to Stalin
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
If only justice had been more common; half of FDR's State Department would have gotten fried too. And throw in (((Harry Dexter White))).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.