I don't blame him for expressing reservations. I expect any sane person would.
-
-
I'm just saying that if there had been an invasion and anything went badly for US after US choose not to use bomb
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nuclear94 @atomicnews
OK, but, again, that wasn't really the only set of options on the table. So this is a non-sequitur at best, false dilemma at worst.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @atomicnews
We will have to agree to disagree because that is the first thing that would have gone through my mind if I was Truman.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nuclear94 @atomicnews
But if one is asking, "did they frame it as bomb vs. invade?" the answer is "no." They did not. This is easy to establish.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @atomicnews
one can never know what was in someone's private thoughts. Often those are just as important as public comments
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I find it very difficult to imagine that what would happen if bomb wasn't used failed to cross Truman's mind
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I admire your efforts to distill what happened long ago from snippets of evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and your willingness to discuss these issues with all of us.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I just can't discount things that I would have thought about even if not in the written record.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK, but that's not history. It's not different than asking, "how would I have felt if I was Isaac Newton and I invented calculus?"
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein @atomicnews
that's ok. I won't be writing any books on the Manhattan Project. I'll leave that to y'all.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.