I think that inclusion of this section in the Smyth Report is good evidence against Canales' argument.pic.twitter.com/k2vFBPloSy
NEW POST: Why was the first history of the bomb so physics-centric? | The Smyth Report: A chemical weapon coverup?http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2017/05/02/smyth-report-chemical-weapon-coverup/ …
-
-
-
I tend to agree. If they are trying to cover it up, why mention it explicitly? You have to imagine them playing a very deep game for that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have been re-reading The Making of the Atomic Bomb, so this is an interesting lens to look through this time around!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The bias seems somewhat warranted, since it was the revolutionary, wild frontier technology that was central in making the device work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet every part was important, the nuclear physics core was, no pun in intended, central to making the whole project possible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.