Why Chemists Get No Credit for ABomb http://theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/04/atom-bomb-pr/523413/?utm_source=twb … @ChemHeritage @NPIHP @ChemistryWorld @AmChemistry @SocHistTech @wellerstein
-
-
Replying to @IEEEhistory @ChemHeritage and
FWIW: I do not think this thesis is correct at all, as someone who has studied the Smyth Report & etc. quite closely.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @IEEEhistory and
Would be curious to hear you say more. Also strikes me as incomplete at best—physicists played a larger role in Manhattan admin, for example
18 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @RandomJetship @IEEEhistory and
Example: even at Los Alamos, in mid-1944, there were roughly equal numbers of physicists (Theo+Exp), chemists (Chem), engineers (Eng).pic.twitter.com/cl8sV8ThRc
0 replies
1 retweet
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.