I've always thought x-ray transparent plasma holds rad channel open, tweak spectrum... Just doesn't have enough pressure vs abltn
-
-
Replying to @NuclearAnthro @Casillic
plus, see kerfuffle over Ken Ford's not-so-subtle not to Sublette's work.http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2015/03/27/h-bomb-headaches/ …
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @NuclearAnthro
@wellerstein Are both methods needed? Foam to slow ablation on outer-case while X-Rays ablates raw tamper? Control / focuses?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Casillic
if foam slows ablation on outer case, why would it not also do so on thermo fuel?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NuclearAnthro @Casillic
My impression is that there are several ways to skin that cat.
5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
as a point of differentiation between straight "radiation implosion" approaches.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein @NuclearAnthro
thinking foam could act like a radiation tamper. Stop rad from bursting case. But rad still hits raw secondary?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
like rad lens Slows ablation out but allows ablation inward secondary. Secondary carrot shaped uniform exposure?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Casillic @NuclearAnthro
So while we enshrine the Mike/Bravo approach as the "gold standard" in Teller-Ulam design, it is not the only path.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein @NuclearAnthro
interesting secondary geometry & properties reference from Teller...pic.twitter.com/zPSGpdK2Gf
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But there is more to be told on this front... trying to finish an article on this very topic soon!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.