I still think it is a good idea as a way to teach about the effects of nuclear war, and may pursue it independently. It is the anti-Fallout.
My game idea (post-apocalyptic Oregon Trail set in 1983) got "Honorable mention" in that Games for Change contest:http://www.gamesforchange.org/2015/12/winner-of-10000-prize-announced-inn-square-game-design-challenge/ …
-
-
-
(I am not opposed to the fun of the Fallout games, of course. They just have zero relationship whatsoever with actual nuclear war.)
-
@wellerstein Fallout is retrofuturistic and thus not so realistic. And what do you mean Anti-fallout, just been curious. -
@zeziberto They are retrofuturistic, but also sci-fi — they don't exist in the same physical universe as us, in terms of physics or biology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@wellerstein If it's a "carefully researched plausible model" of a post-strike environment, would anyone find their way through? -
@russianforces Sure — there are lots of non-targeted small/medium-sized cities in the midwest. Fallout would be the problem, but
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@wellerstein I'd love to see a nuclear war variant. Have you seen the zombie version, Organ Trail? http://p-a.us/1kd5UM7 -
@PostApocalyptic I have indeed — it is one of the inspirations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.