@AnnaNReser Surely true — but there is little to do with nukes that is not problematic in one way or another.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein
.
@wellerstein eh, that's a cop out. If you of all people aren't going to be critical about representations of nuclear history, who is?5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnnaNReser
@AnnaNReser I think it's a fairly complex little piece of cultural work if I do say so myself. I do put thought into these things.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein
@wellerstein I see what you're getting at - it's a good impulse I just don't think you can overcome the banality of the calendar format.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnnaNReser
@AnnaNReser My major efforts are always about riding that line, because it's the only way anything gets beyond academic circles.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellerstein
@wellerstein no objection to your intent here. Just as a design person, I think the calendar form works against your purpose.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AnnaNReser
@wellerstein the form itself is about being noncontroversial and pleasing to look at.6 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @AnnaNReser
@AnnaNReser@wellerstein sorry to butt in but I too blinked @ the calendar medium. I had more of an issue w fetishism than contextualization4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leilasedai
@leilasedai@AnnaNReser It's always an issue with nuclear imagery. I try to be conscious about it — trying to do more than fetishize.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
.
@wellerstein@AnnaNReser i understand that in majority of your other work but this platform bc of its cultural reach has diff complications1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@leilasedai @AnnaNReser I assure you that my calendars have far less cultural reach (in terms of numbers) than my other work! :-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.