And for the thousands of chemists, metallurgists, and engineers on the project, it would be a sore spot—only the physics was declassifiable.
-
-
Replying to @wellerstein
@wellerstein Secrecy about materials, equipment, and other engineering aspects vastly slowed development of peaceful nuclear energy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Atomicrod
@Atomicrod This is because reactors were not, in their initial incarnation, "peaceful" — they were machines for making plutonium.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
@wellerstein Were piles that produced controlled chain reactions and heat that engineers knew could be captured and used. Useful knowledge4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Atomicrod
@wellerstein Jet engines, radar, computers were also not, in their initial incarnation, peaceful. They were tools of war fighting.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Atomicrod
@Atomicrod And the potential payoffs (economically) not entirely obvious at the time. Also, US considered uranium scarce until 1950s.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
@wellerstein Economic risks of allowing atomic energy were apparent to energy establishment. Szilard, Weinberg, Daniels saw opportunity5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Atomicrod It was only by the late 1950s that the US felt secure in its uranium supplies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.