@stuart_w64 the non-nuclear uses of many of these metals and materials, and make speculatively leaps.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @stuart_w64
@stuart_w64 and I would not expect to find any. Again, distinction between these phases of work is crucial but mostly ignored by the cranks.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellerstein
@stuart_w64 As is the distinction between a modest reactor program (which the Germans definitely had) and a bomb production program.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @stuart_w64
@stuart_w64 You would still need a much more advanced reactor program than there is any evidence for. No evidence they achieved criticality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @stuart_w64
@stuart_w64 It leaves traces in the environment (huge amounts of waste and tailings), it releases isotopes into the air and water.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
@stuart_w64 Just another entry into the "bad journalism" file. Daily Mail is not reliable even for quotations on this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.